← Leaderboards
Mira L Katz
Ohio State University
$3,754,669
Attributed
$5,932,602
Total exposure
5
Grants
3
Lead (contact PI)
Attributed= this PI's even-split share of every grant they're on (the fair, additive number). Exposure = full size of all those grants.
Funding over time
peak $1.1M · FY2005–25$2M$1.5M$1M$500K$0
'05
'06
'07
'08
'09
'10
'11
'12
'13
'14
'15
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
Funding mix
By agency
NIH$5,932,602 · 5
By mechanism
R01$4,355,866 · 2
R21$793,857 · 2
K07$782,879 · 1
Top collaborators
- Kevin M. Sweet5 shared
- Paul L Reiter3 shared
Most similar at Ohio State University
Same institution · by research overlap
- Electra D. Paskett$38,729,537
- Raphael E. Pollock$16,802,076
- Clara D Bloomfield$12,059,354
- Chyke Abadama Doubeni$16,866,019
- Paul L Reiter$5,657,255
Others in their field
Top investigators on “United States”
- Leonard Freedman · Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.$818,172,357
- Sonia M Thomas · Research Triangle Institute$700,865,642
- Lawrence Corey · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center$638,373,375
- David Heimbrook · Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.$632,657,800
- Bambra Strokes · Ppd Development Lp$526,656,217
- Tracy L Nolen · Research Triangle Institute$474,487,152
Research focus
United StatesRecommendationMalignant NeoplasmsFutureWomanColorectal Cancer ScreeningScreening For CancerTelephoneCommunitiesIncidenceBaseScreeningScreening GuidelinesMedicalProgramsColorectal CancerCounselingProviderRandomizedInnovationRandomized Controlled TrialsOhioParticipantEducation
Grant awards (18)
A Randomized Controlled Trial: Genetic Counseling Patient Preference Intervention via Electronic Health Record Portal vs. Conventional Genetic Counseling for Women at Elevated Risk for Breast Cancer$527,567
R01 · FY2025 · CA
Strategies for Optimizing a Mailed FIT Program in Appalachia$522,210
R01 · FY2025 · CA
A Randomized Controlled Trial: Genetic Counseling Patient Preference Intervention via Electronic Health Record Portal vs. Conventional Genetic Counseling for Women at Elevated Risk for Breast Cancer$545,404
R01 · FY2024 · CA
Strategies for Optimizing a Mailed FIT Program in Appalachia$468,291
R01 · FY2024 · CA
Strategies for Optimizing a Mailed FIT Program in Appalachia$584,251
R01 · FY2023 · CA
A Randomized Controlled Trial: Genetic Counseling Patient Preference Intervention via Electronic Health Record Portal vs. Conventional Genetic Counseling for Women at Elevated Risk for Breast Cancer$563,894
R01 · FY2023 · CA
A Randomized Controlled Trial: Genetic Counseling Patient Preference Intervention via Electronic Health Record Portal vs. Conventional Genetic Counseling for Women at Elevated Risk for Breast Cancer$580,791
R01 · FY2022 · CA
A Randomized Controlled Trial: Genetic Counseling Patient Preference Intervention via Electronic Health Record Portal vs. Conventional Genetic Counseling for Women at Elevated Risk for Breast Cancer$563,458
R01 · FY2021 · CA
Using audio and video brochures in a mail-based FIT outreach intervention$195,000
R21 · FY2020 · AG · contact PI
Using audio and video brochures in a mail-based FIT outreach intervention$234,000
R21 · FY2019 · AG · contact PI
Team Activation To Increase HPV Vaccination Rates$165,844
R21 · FY2012 · CA · contact PI
Team Activation To Increase HPV Vaccination Rates$199,013
R21 · FY2011 · CA · contact PI
Patient Activation To Increase Colon Cancer Screening$135,108
K07 · FY2009 · CA · contact PI
Patient Activation To Increase Colon Cancer Screening$107,339
K07 · FY2009 · CA · contact PI
Patient Activation To Increase Colon Cancer Screening$135,108
K07 · FY2008 · CA · contact PI
Patient Activation To Increase Colon Cancer Screening$135,108
K07 · FY2007 · CA · contact PI
Patient Activation To Increase Colon Cancer Screening$135,108
K07 · FY2006 · CA · contact PI
Patient Activation To Increase Colon Cancer Screening$135,108
K07 · FY2005 · CA