← Leaderboards
Scott J Hollister
University Of Michigan At Ann Arbor
$15,281,931
Attributed
$18,030,933
Total exposure
13
Grants
8
Lead (contact PI)
Attributed= this PI's even-split share of every grant they're on (the fair, additive number). Exposure = full size of all those grants.
Funding over time
peak $1.5M · FY2005–25$2M$1.5M$1M$500K$0
'05
'06
'07
'08
'09
'10
'11
'12
'13
'14
'15
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
Funding mix
By agency
NIH$18,030,933 · 13
By mechanism
R01$15,990,600 · 8
R21$1,735,013 · 4
R43$305,320 · 1
Top collaborators
- David Adam Zopf3 shared
- Sean Peter Edwards2 shared
- Stanislav Y Emelianov2 shared
- Glenn E Green2 shared
- Shaun Michael Kunisaki2 shared
- Frank La Marca2 shared
- Martin Bocks1 shared
- Steven L Goudy1 shared
Most similar at University Of Michigan At Ann Arbor
Same institution · by research overlap
- Mark E Meyerhoff$16,191,724
- David Adam Zopf$2,156,325
Others in their field
Top investigators on “Design”
- Lawrence Corey · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center$736,542,541
- Sonia M Thomas · Research Triangle Institute$700,865,642
- Tracy L Nolen · Research Triangle Institute$474,487,152
- David Heimbrook · Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.$460,267,569
- Jeffrey P Krischer · University Of South Florida$427,700,530
- David R. Weir · University Of Michigan At Ann Arbor$385,316,144
Research focus
DesignMechanicsIn VivoTissue EngineeringBone RegenerationAnimal ModelPropertyFamily SuidaeImplantScaffoldEngineeringAffectTissuesPolycaprolactoneBaseDevicesReconstructionLifeAnimalsTissue Support FrameStructureSuccessGrowthBlood Vessels
Grant awards (40)
3D Printed Airway Splints: Pre-clinical and Clinical In Vivo Degradation and Tissue Response$709,172
R01 · FY2025 · HL · contact PI
Damage Modeling and Vascular Imaging Correlation with Implant Induced Skin Necrosis$527,826
R01 · FY2025 · AR · contact PI
Developing novel 3D printed grafts for nasal reconstruction$305,320
R43 · FY2025 · DE
Damage Modeling and Vascular Imaging Correlation with Implant Induced Skin Necrosis$584,081
R01 · FY2024 · AR · contact PI
3D printed bioresorbable sleeve device for esophageal atresia repair$242,162
R21 · FY2023 · HD
3D printed bioresorbable sleeve device for esophageal atresia repair$217,463
R21 · FY2022 · HD
Degradation and Fatigue Behavior of 3D Printed Bioresorbable Tracheal Splints$408,678
R01 · FY2020 · HD · contact PI
Degradation and Fatigue Behavior of 3D Printed Bioresorbable Tracheal Splints$581,977
R01 · FY2019 · HD · contact PI
Degradation and Fatigue Behavior of 3D Printed Bioresorbable Tracheal Splints$525,714
R01 · FY2018 · HD · contact PI
Degradation and Fatigue Behavior of 3D Printed Bioresorbable Tracheal Splints$496,207
R01 · FY2017 · HD · contact PI
PGD: A Shape Memory Degradable Polymer for Transcather Atrial Sept$203,938
R21 · FY2017 · HL · contact PI
Degradation and Fatigue Behavior of 3D Printed Bioresorbable Tracheal Splints$359,381
R01 · FY2016 · HD · contact PI
PGD: A shape memory degradable polymer for transcatheter atrial septal defect closure$193,750
R21 · FY2016 · HL · contact PI
Degradation and Fatigue Behavior of 3D Printed Bioresorbable Tracheal Splints$70,245
R01 · FY2016 · HD · contact PI
A Bioresorbable Splint for Treating Tracheomalacia$191,006
R21 · FY2014 · HD
Integrated Structural BMP2 Carrier Systems for Cervical Spine Fusion$613,469
R01 · FY2013 · AR · contact PI
A Bioresorbable Splint for Treating Tracheomalacia$249,259
R21 · FY2013 · HD
Custom Designed Pre-Fabricated Bone Flaps for Mandibular Reconstruction$188,436
R21 · FY2013 · DE · contact PI
Integrated Structural BMP2 Carrier Systems for Cervical Spine Fusion (resubmissi$611,477
R01 · FY2012 · AR · contact PI
Custom Designed Pre-Fabricated Bone Flaps for Mandibular Reconstruction$248,999
R21 · FY2012 · DE · contact PI
Integrated Structural BMP2 Carrier Systems for Cervical Spine Fusion (resubmissi$520,253
R01 · FY2011 · AR · contact PI
Relative Influence of Scaffold Design/Material Parameters On Bone Regeneration$371,359
R01 · FY2011 · AR · contact PI
Relative Influence of Scaffold Design/Material Parameters On Bone Regeneration$375,110
R01 · FY2010 · AR · contact PI
Optimizing Mandibular Scaffold Modulus/Porosity Balance$463,953
R01 · FY2009 · DE · contact PI
Relative Influence of Scaffold Design/Material Parameters On Bone Regeneration$367,863
R01 · FY2009 · AR · contact PI
Optimizing Mandibular Scaffold Modulus/Porosity Balance$483,877
R01 · FY2008 · DE · contact PI
Relative Influence of Scaffold Design/Material Parameters On Bone Regeneration$357,147
R01 · FY2008 · AR · contact PI
Optimizing Mandibular Scaffold Modulus/Porosity Balance$506,598
R01 · FY2007 · DE · contact PI
Relative Influence of Scaffold Design/Material Parameters On Bone Regeneration$409,726
R01 · FY2007 · AR · contact PI
Optimizing Mandibular Scaffold Modulus/Porosity Balance$544,698
R01 · FY2006 · DE · contact PI
Engineering Joint Scaffolds for Function/Regeneration$750,370
R01 · FY2005 · DE
Optimizing Mandibular Scaffold Modulus/Porosity Balance$537,569
R01 · FY2005 · DE
Engineering Joint Scaffolds for Function/Regeneration$832,757
R01 · FY2004 · DE
Engineering Joint Scaffolds for Function/Regeneration$808,501
R01 · FY2003 · DE
DESIGNED SCAFFOLD ARCHITECTURE AFFECTS BONE REGENERATION$389,885
R01 · FY2003 · DE
Engineering Joint Scaffolds for Function/Regeneration$784,953
R01 · FY2002 · DE
DESIGNED SCAFFOLD ARCHITECTURE AFFECTS BONE REGENERATION$436,757
R01 · FY2002 · DE
Engineering Joint Scaffolds for Function/Regeneration$755,530
R01 · FY2001 · DE
DESIGNED SCAFFOLD ARCHITECTURE AFFECTS BONE REGENERATION$387,415
R01 · FY2001 · DE
DESIGNED SCAFFOLD ARCHITECTURE AFFECTS BONE REGENERATION$418,052
R01 · FY2000 · DE