GGrantIndex
← Leaderboards

Brian S Schwartz

Johns Hopkins University

$11,115,473
Attributed
$11,115,473
Total exposure
7
Grants
6
Lead (contact PI)

Attributed= this PI's even-split share of every grant they're on (the fair, additive number). Exposure = full size of all those grants. They are the sole PI on all grants (the two match).

Funding over time

peak $918.8K · FY200522
$1M$750K$500K$250K$0
'05
'06
'07
'08
'09
'10
'11
'12
'13
'14
'15
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22

Funding mix

By agency

NIH$11,115,473 · 7

By mechanism

R01$7,303,488 · 3
U19$2,574,244 · 1
P01$559,165 · 1
R21$479,901 · 1
P30$198,675 · 1

Top collaborators

No co-investigators on record.

Most similar at Johns Hopkins University

Same institution · by research overlap

Others in their field

Top investigators on “Prevalence

Research focus

PrevalenceClinical ResearchNeurotoxinsAccountingGenotypeSerumMediatingCommunitiesNovel StrategiesEtiologyBaseVisitRisk FactorsBlood PressurePopulation BasedAgingApolipoprotein EHuman SubjectPennsylvaniaPrimary Health CareElectronic Health RecordEvaluationAsthmaCounty

Grant awards (21)

Integrated Health Sciences Facility Core$198,675
P30 · FY2022 · ES · contact PI
CRS Epidemiology Using New Approaches to Validation in Population-based Studies$529,731
U19 · FY2017 · AI · contact PI
CRS Epidemiology Using New Approaches to Validation in Population-based Studies$808,226
U19 · FY2016 · AI · contact PI
CRS Epidemiology Using New Approaches to Validation in Population-based Studies$549,142
U19 · FY2015 · AI · contact PI
Marcellus shale development, respiratory & reproductive outcomes in Pennsylvania$248,248
R21 · FY2015 · ES · contact PI
CRS Epidemiology Using New Approaches to Validation in Population-based Studies$687,145
U19 · FY2014 · AI · contact PI
Marcellus shale development, respiratory & reproductive outcomes in Pennsylvania$231,653
R21 · FY2014 · ES · contact PI
CRS Epidemiology Using New Approaches to Validation in Population-based Studies$559,165
P01 · FY2013 · AI · contact PI
Explaining Disparities in Cognitive Function in Seniors$434,016
R01 · FY2011 · AG · contact PI
Explaining Disparities in Cognitive Function in Seniors$575,248
R01 · FY2010 · AG · contact PI
Explaining Disparities in Cognitive Function in Seniors$568,265
R01 · FY2009 · AG · contact PI
Explaining Disparities in Cognitive Function in Seniors$470,896
R01 · FY2008 · AG · contact PI
Age, Lead, Exposure, and Neurobehavioral Decline$548,665
R01 · FY2007 · AG · contact PI
Age, Lead, Exposure, and Neurobehavioral Decline$583,581
R01 · FY2006 · AG · contact PI
Age, Lead, Exposure, and Neurobehavioral Decline$626,372
R01 · FY2005 · AG
EXPLAINING DISPARITIES IN COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN SENIORS$604,920
R01 · FY2004 · AG
EXPLAINING DISPARITIES IN COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN SENIORS$600,952
R01 · FY2003 · AG
EXPLAINING DISPARITIES IN COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN SENIORS$602,043
R01 · FY2002 · AG
EXPLAINING DISPARITIES IN COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN SENIORS$602,717
R01 · FY2001 · AG
EXPLAINING DISPARITIES IN COGNITIVE FUNCTION IN SENIORS$597,807
R01 · FY2000 · AG
EXPOSURE, DOSE, BODY BURDEN AND HEALTH EFFECTS OF LEAD$488,006
R01 · FY2000 · ES