← Leaderboards
Nicola Grissom
University Of Minnesota
$2,474,347
Attributed
$2,474,347
Total exposure
1
Grants
1
Lead (contact PI)
Attributed= this PI's even-split share of every grant they're on (the fair, additive number). Exposure = full size of all those grants. They are the sole PI on all grants (the two match).
Funding over time
peak $528.5K · FY2020–24$1M$750K$500K$250K$0
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
Funding mix
By agency
NIH$2,474,347 · 1
By mechanism
R01$2,474,347 · 1
Top collaborators
No co-investigators on record.
Most similar at University Of Minnesota
Same institution · by research overlap
- Sophia Vinogradov$21,163,662
- Jocelyn M Richard$5,008,686
- Angus W Macdonald$10,311,025
- Benjamin Thomas Saunders$5,440,066
- John Meitzen$3,198,912
Others in their field
Other Emerging Leaders on “16p11.2”
- Christine Ladd-Acosta · Johns Hopkins University$4,560,160
- Jacob A.s. Vorstman · Hospital For Sick Chldrn (Toronto)$3,107,797
- Santhosh Girirajan · Pennsylvania State University, The$2,779,378
- Donna Marie McDonald-McGinn · Children'S Hosp Of Philadelphia$2,412,234
- Abhishek Seth · Nemours Children'S Hospital, Orlando$1,649,510
- Amina Abubakar · Massachusetts General Hospital$889,733
Research focus
16p11.2AnimalsAutism Spectrum DisorderAnimal ModelBehaviorBehavioralBiobehaviorBiologyBrainCalcium SignalingCellsCell TypeChoice BehaviorCognitionCognitiveCognitive TestingComplexComputer ModelsCopy Number PolymorphismCorpus Striatum StructureDecision MakingDiagnosisDiscountingDopamine
Grant awards (5)
Sex-biased impacts of 16p11.2 variants on reward-guided choice$485,263
R01 · FY2024 · MH · contact PI
Sex-biased impacts of 16p11.2 variants on reward-guided choice$492,190
R01 · FY2023 · MH · contact PI
Sex-biased impacts of 16p11.2 variants on reward-guided choice$484,389
R01 · FY2022 · MH · contact PI
Sex-biased impacts of 16p11.2 variants on reward-guided choice$483,963
R01 · FY2021 · MH · contact PI
Sex-biased impacts of 16p11.2 variants on reward-guided choice$528,542
R01 · FY2020 · MH · contact PI