← Leaderboards
Ann C Lowry
Univ Of North Carolina Chapel Hill
$1,120,681
Attributed
$5,603,407
Total exposure
2
Grants
0
Lead (contact PI)
Attributed= this PI's even-split share of every grant they're on (the fair, additive number). Exposure = full size of all those grants.
Funding over time
peak $2.5M · FY2016–19$2.5M$1.9M$1.3M$625K$0
'16
'17
'18
'19
Funding mix
By agency
NIH$5,603,407 · 2
By mechanism
U01$4,891,974 · 1
U34$711,433 · 1
Top collaborators
- Adil E. Bharucha4 shared
- Marie G Gantz4 shared
- Satish Sc Rao4 shared
- William E Whitehead4 shared
Most similar at Univ Of North Carolina Chapel Hill
Same institution · by research overlap
- Naim Ur Rashid$1,282,132
- Susan Tsai$1,685,194
- Jen Jen Yeh$14,819,320
- Evan Samuel Dellon$7,064,598
- Gita Natwar Mody$808,628
Others in their field
Top investigators on “Electric Stimulation”
- Kenneth A Bloom · University Of Nebraska-Lincoln$46,979,168
- John Hobbs · Suny At Stony Brook$41,239,084
- Christopher Bee · Suny At Stony Brook$41,239,084
- Anders Ryd · Cornell University$27,124,994
- Daniel R Marlow · University Of California-Los Angeles$27,124,994
- Ziad Nahas · Medical University Of South Carolina$23,619,697
Research focus
Electric StimulationFrequenciesDesignEducational WorkshopFecesFollow-UpData Coordinating CenterAlternative TreatmentColorectal SurgeryDiscipline Of NursingCostFecal IncontinenceBaseAgreementBiofeedbackAdverse EventCharacteristicsClinicAdmission ActivityClinical ResearchAnusDiabetes MellitusCompare EffectivenessInclusion Criteria
Grant awards (4)
Fecal Incontinence Treatment Study (FIT Study)$2,400,000
U01 · FY2019 · DK
Fecal Incontinence Treatment Study (FIT Study)$2,491,974
U01 · FY2018 · DK
Comparative Effectiveness of Biofeedback, Sacral Nerve Stimulation, and Injectable Bulking Agents for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence$326,318
U34 · FY2017 · DK
Comparative Effectiveness of Biofeedback, Sacral Nerve Stimulation, and Injectable Bulking Agents for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence$385,115
U34 · FY2016 · DK