← Leaderboards
Douglas Lowell Theobald
Brandeis University
$6,696,148
Attributed
$7,342,948
Total exposure
4
Grants
3
Lead (contact PI)
Attributed= this PI's even-split share of every grant they're on (the fair, additive number). Exposure = full size of all those grants.
Funding over time
peak $1M · FY2010–25$2M$1.5M$1M$500K$0
'10
'11
'12
'13
'14
'15
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
Funding mix
By agency
NIH$7,342,948 · 4
By mechanism
R01$7,342,948 · 4
Top collaborators
- Jeff Gelles4 shared
Most similar at Brandeis University
Same institution · by research overlap
- Michael Jacob Kahana$26,815,124
- Bulbul Chakraborty$5,463,368
- Daniel Ruberman$1,901,417
- Albion E Lawrence$1,067,651
- Blake Lebaron$573,534
Others in their field
Top investigators on “Proteins”
- David Heimbrook · Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.$354,061,551
- Randall J Bateman · Washington University$187,292,085
- Paul S. Aisen · Cognition Therapeutics, Inc.$175,382,342
- Reisa A. Sperling · Banner Health$145,046,481
- Barton F Haynes · Duke University$136,029,850
- Joseph L Goldstein · University Of Texas Sw Med Ctr/Dallas$102,433,280
Research focus
ProteinsBaseEvolutionMolecularStructureResolutionEnzymesEngineeringOrganismPathway InteractionsBayesian AnalysisSubstrate SpecificityInnovationComplexBiochemicalTheoriesPhylogenetic AnalysisBiologicalBiophysicsBindingFluorescenceAdoptedKineticsReaction
Grant awards (23)
Evolution of enzyme function, mechanism, dynamics, and structure viewed at atomic resolution$352,475
R01 · FY2025 · GM · contact PI
Evolution of enzyme function, mechanism, dynamics, and structure viewed at atomic resolution$352,310
R01 · FY2024 · GM · contact PI
Empirically testing the accuracy and bias of ancestral protein resurrection methods$345,313
R01 · FY2022 · GM · contact PI
Empirically testing the accuracy and bias of ancestral protein resurrection methods$345,313
R01 · FY2021 · GM · contact PI
Joint Bayesian analysis of single-molecule colocalization images and kinetics$323,400
R01 · FY2021 · GM
Empirically testing the accuracy and bias of ancestral protein resurrection methods$345,313
R01 · FY2020 · GM · contact PI
Joint Bayesian analysis of single-molecule colocalization images and kinetics$323,400
R01 · FY2020 · GM
Evolution of enzyme function, mechanism, dynamics, and structure viewed at atomic resolution$346,927
R01 · FY2019 · GM · contact PI
Empirically testing the accuracy and bias of ancestral protein resurrection methods$345,313
R01 · FY2019 · GM · contact PI
Joint Bayesian analysis of single-molecule colocalization images and kinetics$323,400
R01 · FY2019 · GM
Evolution of enzyme function, mechanism, dynamics, and structure viewed at atomic resolution$346,927
R01 · FY2018 · GM · contact PI
Joint Bayesian analysis of single-molecule colocalization images and kinetics$323,400
R01 · FY2018 · GM
Evolution of enzyme function, mechanism, dynamics, and structure viewed at atomic resolution$346,927
R01 · FY2017 · GM · contact PI
Evolution of enzyme function, mechanism, dynamics, and structure viewed at atomic resolution$346,927
R01 · FY2016 · GM · contact PI
Evolution of enzyme structure and function viewed at atomic resolution$294,680
R01 · FY2014 · GM · contact PI
Bayesian analysis of structural shape and conformation$287,161
R01 · FY2014 · GM · contact PI
Evolution of enzyme structure and function viewed at atomic resolution$284,366
R01 · FY2013 · GM · contact PI
Bayesian analysis of structural shape and conformation$277,111
R01 · FY2013 · GM · contact PI
Evolution of enzyme structure and function viewed at atomic resolution$294,680
R01 · FY2012 · GM · contact PI
Bayesian analysis of structural shape and conformation$287,161
R01 · FY2012 · GM · contact PI
Bayesian analysis of structural shape and conformation$287,161
R01 · FY2011 · GM · contact PI
Evolution of enzyme structure and function viewed at atomic resolution$281,475
R01 · FY2011 · GM · contact PI
Bayesian analysis of structural shape and conformation$281,808
R01 · FY2010 · GM · contact PI