← Leaderboards
Andrei G Pakhomov
Old Dominion University
$5,177,029
Attributed
$5,373,725
Total exposure
6
Grants
5
Lead (contact PI)
Attributed= this PI's even-split share of every grant they're on (the fair, additive number). Exposure = full size of all those grants.
Funding over time
peak $560.9K · FY2008–25$1M$750K$500K$250K$0
'08
'09
'10
'11
'12
'13
'14
'15
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
Funding mix
By agency
NIH$5,373,725 · 6
By mechanism
R01$3,700,332 · 3
R21$1,673,393 · 3
Top collaborators
- Shu Xiao2 shared
Most similar at Old Dominion University
Same institution · by research overlap
- Michael William Stacey$352,044
Others in their field
Top investigators on “Tissues”
- David Heimbrook · Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.$346,311,904
- Lawrence Corey · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center$230,011,824
- Larry Arthur$159,140,370
- Douglas S. Hawkins · Children'S Hosp Of Philadelphia$157,315,120
- Judith S. Currier · University Of California Los Angeles$138,805,403
- Joseph J. Eron · Univ Of North Carolina Chapel Hill$138,805,403
Research focus
TissuesCellsMembranePhysiologic PulseDyesNanosecondElectric FieldMedicalVoltagePhysiologicalPropertyTechnologyCell MembraneResponseNecrosisPathway InteractionsElectroporationMillisecondBaseEngineeringApoptoticSignal TransductionElectrodesIn Vivo
Grant awards (20)
Next Generation Temporal Interference Stimulation for Non-Invasive Neuromodulation$160,000
R21 · FY2025 · EY · contact PI
Next Generation Temporal Interference Stimulation for Non-Invasive Neuromodulation$240,000
R21 · FY2024 · EY · contact PI
Targeted Neuromodulation by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields$160,000
R21 · FY2024 · EY · contact PI
Targeted Neuromodulation by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields$240,000
R21 · FY2023 · EY · contact PI
Next Generation Temporal Interference Stimulation for Non-Invasive Neuromodulation$240,000
R21 · FY2023 · EY · contact PI
Targeted Neuromodulation by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields$240,000
R21 · FY2022 · EY · contact PI
Low Energy Defibrillation with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field$376,266
R01 · FY2018 · HL · contact PI
Low Energy Defibrillation with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field$377,001
R01 · FY2017 · HL · contact PI
Low Energy Defibrillation with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field$377,687
R01 · FY2016 · HL · contact PI
Low Energy Defibrillation with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field$378,329
R01 · FY2015 · HL · contact PI
Picosecond pulse technology for non-invasive electrostimulation$182,588
R21 · FY2015 · EB
Picosecond pulse technology for non-invasive electrostimulation$210,805
R21 · FY2014 · EB
Mechanisms and Implications of Nanoelectroporation in Living Cells$278,173
R01 · FY2013 · GM · contact PI
Mechanisms and Implications of Nanoelectroporation in Living Cells$286,886
R01 · FY2012 · GM · contact PI
Mechanisms and Implications of Nanoelectroporation in Living Cells$281,853
R01 · FY2011 · GM · contact PI
Cell Death Induction by High-Voltage, Nanosecond-duration Electric Pulses$252,100
R01 · FY2011 · CA · contact PI
Mechanisms and Implications of Nanoelectroporation in Living Cells$272,963
R01 · FY2010 · GM · contact PI
Cell Death Induction by High-Voltage, Nanosecond-duration Electric Pulses$255,604
R01 · FY2010 · CA · contact PI
Cell Death Induction by High-Voltage, Nanosecond-duration Electric Pulses$284,241
R01 · FY2009 · CA · contact PI
Cell Death Induction by High-Voltage, Nanosecond-duration Electric Pulses$279,229
R01 · FY2008 · CA · contact PI