← Leaderboards
Christopher G Beevers
University Of Texas At Austin
$6,374,082
Attributed
$8,954,030
Total exposure
8
Grants
7
Lead (contact PI)
Attributed= this PI's even-split share of every grant they're on (the fair, additive number). Exposure = full size of all those grants.
Funding over time
peak $1.4M · FY2007–25$2M$1.5M$1M$500K$0
'07
'08
'09
'10
'11
'12
'13
'14
'15
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
Funding mix
By agency
NIH$8,954,030 · 8
By mechanism
R01$4,934,649 · 3
R33$1,972,968 · 1
R21$1,279,741 · 3
R56$766,672 · 1
Top collaborators
- W Todd Todd Maddox5 shared
- David M Schnyer3 shared
- Fabian A Soto2 shared
- John J. Allen1 shared
- John E Mcgeary1 shared
Most similar at University Of Texas At Austin
Same institution · by research overlap
- Stephen Carl Ekker$26,975,631
- John Digiovanni$26,040,423
- Robert O. Messing$27,062,687
- Karen M Vasquez$14,235,066
- Edward M Marcotte$18,392,625
Others in their field
Top investigators on “Cognitive”
- David R. Weir · University Of Michigan At Ann Arbor$380,402,429
- Paul S. Aisen · Cognition Therapeutics, Inc.$185,453,129
- Randall J Bateman · Washington University$179,917,643
- Reisa A. Sperling · Banner Health$160,454,465
- Michael W Weiner · Northern California Institute Res &Educ$153,571,751
- Ronald C Petersen · Mayo Clinic Coll Of Medicine, Rochester$118,618,221
Research focus
CognitivePsychopathologyAdultStimulusAttentionMaintenanceMental DepressionTrainingTheoriesVariantDepressed MoodMediatingMajor Depressive DisorderDepressive SymptomsGenesGeneticClinical TrialsSymptomsBaseVariation (Genetics)PhenotypeEmotionsAllelesSampling
Grant awards (22)
Confirmatory Efficacy Trial of a Traditional vs. Gamified Attention Bias Modification for Depression$629,984
R01 · FY2025 · MH · contact PI
Confirmatory Efficacy Trial of a Traditional vs. Gamified Attention Bias Modification for Depression$629,984
R01 · FY2024 · MH · contact PI
Confirmatory Efficacy Trial of a Traditional vs. Gamified Attention Bias Modification for Depression$714,349
R01 · FY2023 · MH · contact PI
Development of Attention Bias Modification for Depression$655,830
R33 · FY2019 · MH · contact PI
Development of Attention Bias Modification for Depression$655,830
R33 · FY2018 · MH · contact PI
Perceptual and decisional processes underlying face perception biases in clinical depression$189,210
R21 · FY2018 · MH
Development of Attention Bias Modification for Depression$661,308
R33 · FY2017 · MH · contact PI
Perceptual and decisional processes underlying face perception biases in clinical depression$239,809
R21 · FY2017 · MH
Machine Learning and Personalized Prognosis for Depression Treatment$195,625
R21 · FY2017 · MH · contact PI
Contribution of Genome-Wide Variation to Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression$766,672
R56 · FY2016 · MH · contact PI
Genetic Influences on Dual Processing Modes of Reward and Punishment Learning$415,372
R01 · FY2016 · DA · contact PI
Machine Learning and Personalized Prognosis for Depression Treatment$234,375
R21 · FY2016 · MH · contact PI
Genetic Influences on Dual Processing Modes of Reward and Punishment Learning$433,688
R01 · FY2015 · DA
Genetic Influences on Dual Processing Modes of Reward and Punishment Learning$440,294
R01 · FY2014 · DA
Genetic Influences on Dual Processing Modes of Reward and Punishment Learning$422,231
R01 · FY2013 · DA
Genetic Influences on Dual Processing Modes of Reward and Punishment Learning$418,803
R01 · FY2012 · DA
Genetic Influences on Dual Processing Modes of Reward and Punishment Learning$20,664
R01 · FY2012 · DA
Attention Training for Major Depressive Disorder$190,472
R21 · FY2011 · MH · contact PI
Attention Training for Major Depressive Disorder$230,250
R21 · FY2010 · MH · contact PI
Genetic Associations with Biased Processing of Emotion Cues in MDD$265,499
R01 · FY2009 · MH · contact PI
Genetic Associations with Biased Processing of Emotion Cues in MDD$265,478
R01 · FY2008 · MH · contact PI
Genetic Associations with Biased Processing of Emotion Cues in MDD$278,303
R01 · FY2007 · MH · contact PI