← Leaderboards
David R Hyde
University Of Notre Dame
$4,394,170
Attributed
$8,696,597
Total exposure
7
Grants
6
Lead (contact PI)
Attributed= this PI's even-split share of every grant they're on (the fair, additive number). Exposure = full size of all those grants.
Funding over time
peak $1.6M · FY2006–25$2M$1.5M$1M$500K$0
'06
'07
'08
'09
'10
'11
'12
'13
'14
'15
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
Funding mix
By agency
NIH$8,696,597 · 7
By mechanism
R01$4,833,175 · 4
U01$3,043,859 · 1
R21$819,563 · 2
Top collaborators
- Seth Blackshaw8 shared
- Jiang Qian8 shared
- John D. Ash4 shared
- Andy J Fischer4 shared
- Ryan Thummel4 shared
- Brian D Perkins3 shared
Most similar at University Of Notre Dame
Same institution · by research overlap
- Ryan Thummel$4,832,737
- Seth Blackshaw$26,906,929
- Brian D Perkins$10,517,876
Others in their field
Top investigators on “Cells”
- Lawrence Corey · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center$536,344,731
- Barton F Haynes · Duke University$457,457,619
- David Heimbrook · Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc.$454,789,509
- Glenda E Gray · Wits Health Consortium (Pty), Ltd$299,104,942
- Dennis R. Burton · Scripps Research Institute$278,781,854
- Mary M Horowitz · Medical College Of Wisconsin$237,383,608
Research focus
CellsLightRetinaNatural RegenerationResponseRetinal RegenerationNeuronsZebrafishRetinal NeuronBlindnessMolecularProliferatingGene ExpressionGenesRetinalRetinal DamageTranscription FactorNerve Stem CellProteinsSignal TransductionMuller&AposS CellStem CellsProgenitor
Grant awards (22)
Elucidating and bypassing molecular mechanisms that suppress Muller glia-dependent regeneration of cones in two zebrafish models of chronic retinal damage$555,742
R01 · FY2025 · EY · contact PI
Elucidating and bypassing molecular mechanisms that suppress Muller glia-dependent regeneration of cones in two zebrafish models of chronic retinal damage$555,742
R01 · FY2024 · EY · contact PI
Elucidating and bypassing molecular mechanisms that suppress Muller glia-dependent regeneration of cones in two zebrafish models of chronic retinal damage$591,761
R01 · FY2023 · EY · contact PI
Comparative transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses of Muller glia reprogramming$500,000
U01 · FY2019 · EY · contact PI
Comparative transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses of Muller glia reprogramming$627,746
U01 · FY2018 · EY · contact PI
Comparative transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses of Muller glia reprogramming$645,688
U01 · FY2017 · EY · contact PI
Comparative transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses of Muller glia reprogramming$576,178
U01 · FY2017 · EY · contact PI
Roles of TNFa and Notch to Initiate Retinal Regeneration from Muller glia$380,000
R01 · FY2017 · EY · contact PI
Comparative transcriptomic and epigenomic analyses of Muller glia reprogramming$694,247
U01 · FY2016 · EY · contact PI
Roles of TNFa and Notch to Initiate Retinal Regeneration from Muller glia$380,000
R01 · FY2016 · EY · contact PI
Roles of TNFa and Notch to Initiate Retinal Regeneration from Muller glia$380,000
R01 · FY2015 · EY · contact PI
Genetic Hierarchy Underlying Photoreceptor Regeneration$320,760
R01 · FY2012 · EY · contact PI
Genetic Hierarchy Underlying Photoreceptor Regeneration$320,760
R01 · FY2011 · EY · contact PI
Genetic Hierarchy Underlying Photoreceptor Regeneration$334,125
R01 · FY2010 · EY · contact PI
Genetic Hierarchy Underlying Photoreceptor Regeneration$337,500
R01 · FY2009 · EY · contact PI
Role of Pax6 in photoreceptor cell regeneration using conditional knockdowns$225,000
R21 · FY2009 · EY · contact PI
Role of Pax6 in photoreceptor cell regeneration using conditional knockdowns$225,000
R21 · FY2008 · EY · contact PI
Development of Genetic Tools to Study Retinal Regeneration$182,063
R21 · FY2007 · EY · contact PI
Development of Genetic Tools to Study Retinal Regeneration$187,500
R21 · FY2006 · EY · contact PI
MECHANISMS OF RETINAL DEGENERATION$232,235
R01 · FY2002 · EY
MECHANISMS OF RETINAL DEGENERATION$225,530
R01 · FY2001 · EY
MECHANISMS OF RETINAL DEGENERATION$219,020
R01 · FY2000 · EY