EMA Assessment of Biobehavioral Processes in Human Pregnancy

University Of California-Irvine, Irvine CA

Investigators

Linked publications & trials

Abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Adverse birth outcomes (reduced length of gestation/ impaired fetal growth) are recognized as the most significant problem in maternal-child health in the United States. A substantial body of empirical evidence in animals and humans suggests that high levels of maternal psychosocial stress in pregnancy constitute an independent risk factor for these adverse outcomes. However, the translation of this knowledge from the population to individual level for risk assessment and intervention is limited by the fact that the commonly-used self-report, retrospective recall measures of stress have low sensitivity and specificity in predicting adverse birth outcomes. Two major weaknesses of the stress and birth outcome literature relate to (a) limitations in the traditional approach to assess maternal psychosocial stress, and (b) the failure to assess and account for individual differences in biological stress responsivity. Recent advances in ecological momentary assessment (EMA) sampling methods now afford the opportunity of assessing the dynamic interplay of psychological, behavioral and biological processes in natural settings to address shortcomings and knowledge gaps in this literature. We propose to import and adapt these methods into the area of behavioral perinatology research. Our specific aims are: 1) To estimate the magnitude of the effect of maternal psychosocial stress on a) maternal-placental-fetal (MPF) hormonal parameters, and b) birth outcomes;2) To estimate the magnitude of the effect of maternal biological stress reactivity on a) MPF hormonal parameters, and b) birth outcomes;and 3) To determine whether the magnitude of the effect of maternal stress is modulated by the stage in gestation of occurrence of stress. Complete prospective data will be collected in a sample of at least 120 pregnant women over three 4-day assessments in early, mid and late gestation. Electronic diaries (PDAs) will be used to collect 15 measures/day of subjects'psychological state and other contextual information. Continuous ambulatory measures of maternal heart rate, respiration and physical activity, as well as seven saliva samples over the course of each day, will be collected for indicators of autonomic and endocrine activity. At the end of each ambulatory session, a maternal blood sample will be collected for measures of MPF endocrine mediators (CRH, E3). These data will be merged in time-synchronized datasets;time-invariant and time-variant variables will be computed by methods including subject-specific auto-regression models, and multivariate and longitudinal regression analysis will be employed to test the specific aims and hypotheses using generalizing estimating equations (GEE) and multi-level mixed models with fixed and random effects (hierarchical linear models;HLM). The scientific significance of our proposal pertains to understanding psychobiological mechanisms that are likely determinants of individual vulnerability for stress-related adverse birth outcomes, whereas the public health significance of this research pertains to the development and assessment of new measures and methodologies that will increase the specificity and sensitivity of biopsychosocial risk assessment and provide an empirical basis for the development and evaluation of comprehensive intervention strategies to reduce the unacceptably high incidence of adverse birth outcomes. Findings from our study also will inform the proposed psychobiological stress assessment protocol of the National Children's Study (NCS).