Clinical Studies of Vaccines for Pandemic Influenza

National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases

Investigators

Linked publications & trials

Abstract

Seasonal epidemics and sporadic pandemics of influenza A viruses (IAV) pose a global public health burden. Influenza A viruses are divided into subtypes on the basis of the antigenicity and nucleotide sequence relatedness of their surface glycoproteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). Hemagglutinin-specific antibodies directly bind the virus and prevent its entry into host cells, providing narrow immunity from reinfection by closely related strains. CD8 T cell responses to IAV generated against highly conserved viral proteins/epitopes contribute to clearance of virus during primary IAV infection and also confer broad heterosubtypic protection in animal models. Recent evidence links the cross-reactive CD8 T cell response in man to reduced viral replication and protection from severe illness in pandemic H1N1 infections in European populations, and H7N9 infections in China. Because pre-existing T-cell immunity, independent of baseline antibodies, protects against symptoms and viral shedding associated with influenza, influenza vaccines that stimulate broadly reactive CD8 T cell responses may have the capacity to protect against any pandemic influenza A virus. Human infections with H5N1 and H7N9 avian IAV and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic have spurred an interest in the development of vaccines against IAV with pandemic potential. Major challenges to this effort include our inability to predict which virus will emerge and rapid production and deployment of vaccine if the virus spreads rapidly and vaccine yield is not optimal. In addition, the number of doses of vaccine required depends on whether the population is immunologically naive. Outbreaks of severe respiratory disease in humans in Eastern China due to H7N9 influenza viruses began to occur in 2013. Therefore, development of safe and effective vaccines for H7N9 and other H7 viruses is a critical component of pandemic preparedness. High levels of immune memory are achieved by vaccination with repeated doses of a live attenuated influenza virus vaccine followed by vaccination with antigenically matched inactivated influenza virus vaccine. However, the potential effects of vaccinating with live attenuated influenza virus vaccine followed by vaccination with antigenically mismatched inactivated influenza virus vaccine are unknown. This is an important question because it is possible that priming the immune response with a live attenuated vaccine followed by boosting with mismatched inactivated virus vaccine might result in a broader immune response than priming and boosting with the same virus. Two years ago completed a trial entitled A Phase I Study In Healthy Adults To Assess Priming With Antigenically Mismatched Live Attenuated A/H7N3 Influenza Virus Vaccine Followed By Inactivated A/H7N9 Influenza Virus Vaccine. In this study we vaccinated volunteers with two doses of live attenuated H7N3 influenza virus and then boosted them with a mismatched virus (inactivated H7N3). While some results have been obtained, additional testing of serum is being performing in the Subbarao laboratory. Last year we also completed a clinical protocol Immunogenicity and Safety Study of Inactivated Subunit H5N1 Influenza Vaccine in Prior Recipients of Live Attenuated H2N2, H6N1 and H9N2 Influenza Vaccines and in H5N1 and Live Attenuated Vaccine Nave Individuals. This study examined the effect of administering a group 1 pandemic inactivated subvirion vaccine (H5N1) vaccine to previous recipients of a different group 1 pandemic live attenuated influenza vaccine recipients (H2N2, H6N1 or H9N2 live influenza vaccines). The objective was to determine whether boosting with an inactivated vaccine with shared hemagglutinin (HA) stem region, but a mismatched HA head region will boost the HA stem antibody response more than the HA head antibody response. The study was been completed last year. In FY 2021, we analyzed the results and found that boosting with the inactivated vaccine with shared hemagglutinin (HA) stem region, but a mismatched HA head region did not boost the HA stem antibody response more than the HA head antibody response in previous recipients of a different group 1 pandemic live attenuated influenza vaccine. The likely reason for this lack of an effect of boosting is that it had been many years since the subjects in the trial had received the pandemic live attenuated influenza vaccine and all the subjects had likely been exposed to natural infection with influenza during the years between vaccinating with live attenuated influenza and boosting with the inactivated vaccine. Overall there were very weak memory B-cell responses to the H5N1 inactivated influenza vaccine, and there was no difference between the groups based on pre-vaccination status. ELISA responses to the different influenza strains showed very little response to the non-vaccine strains, and no difference in the groups in response to the H5N1. When passive antibody transfer was conducted in mice, and the mice were challenged with the virulent H6N1, all mice died at the dilution of 1:100 with no considerable differences between naive/immune or pre/post vaccination sera. No further experiments are planned with samples obtained from the vaccine subjects.