GGrantIndex
← Search

PROTOCOL REVIEW AND MONITORING SYSTEM (Core-014)

$63,385P30FY2018CANIH

Stanford University, Stanford CA

Investigators

Linked publications, trials & patents

Paper 39574895Paper 39534431Paper 39506045Paper 39378093Paper 39257774Paper 39179931Paper 39163262Paper 39132489Paper 39042439Paper 38997156Paper 38996463Paper 38987048Paper 38968138Paper 38838737Paper 38810650Paper 38746193Paper 38563850Paper 38496616Paper 38496500Paper 38408498Paper 38387457Paper 38278150Paper 38273211Paper 38262408Paper 38260330Paper 38200310Paper 38154193Paper 38096469Paper 37963187Paper 37917579Paper 37882771Paper 37812494Paper 37743567Paper 37667254Paper 37662553Paper 37534980Paper 37532139Paper 37527449Paper 37398193Paper 37244414Paper 37196642Paper 37184546Paper 37162847Paper 36999999Paper 36993756Paper 36813894Paper 36747642Paper 36734849Paper 36729432Paper 36729074Paper 36719070Paper 36717409Paper 36711732Paper 36701540Paper 36652552Paper 36640300Paper 36635501Paper 36624348Trial NCT05220254Trial NCT03733210Trial NCT03405142Trial NCT03241940Trial NCT03179449Trial NCT02855086Trial NCT02805075Trial NCT02762266Trial NCT02736578Trial NCT02735356Trial NCT02699723Trial NCT02695628Trial NCT02690948Trial NCT02683824Trial NCT02635074Trial NCT02624518Trial NCT02599194Trial NCT02581787Trial NCT02488070Trial NCT02440308Trial NCT02432118Trial NCT02429804Trial NCT02415608Trial NCT02401347Trial NCT02215928Trial NCT02210858Trial NCT02203565Trial NCT02184533Trial NCT02175745Trial NCT02166983Trial NCT02058550Trial NCT02030405Trial NCT02019069Trial NCT01977677Trial NCT01943188Trial NCT01928030Trial NCT01926990Trial NCT01908166Trial NCT01904643Trial NCT01898403Trial NCT01893892Trial NCT01868503

Abstract

PROJECT SUMMARY ? PROTOCOL REVIEW AND MONITORING SYSTEM Overview The Protocol Review and Monitoring System (PRMS), referred to at Stanford as the Scientific Review Committee (SRC), has been operational at Stanford University since 2005. Each year we have reviewed our operations and implemented improvements in order to ensure that studies conducted at the Stanford Cancer Institute (SCI) are of the highest scientific merit, feasible to conduct and employ resources appropriately. SCI's SRC is charged with providing peer review of all institutional and national clinical research protocols involving cancer patients at Stanford. The patient and other populations from which SCI studies are drawn include those in the Stanford Clinical Cancer Center, Stanford Health Care at large including outreach sites, Stanford Children's Health and the Cancer Prevention Institute of California. Scientific review applies to all phases of clinical therapeutic intervention, behavioral clinical trials, tissue and body fluid research, and diagnostic trials that impact medical decision making for the treatment of cancer patients. Particular attention is paid to reviewing investigator-initiated clinical trials, and especially those for which there is no other peer-review mechanism. The primary focus of scientific review is on the scientific merit of the study. However, the SRC is also responsible for ensuring that studies conform to the research objectives and priorities of SCI. Scientific review is performed in addition to the review of ethical issues carried out by Stanford's Administrative Panels on Human Subjects in Medical Research, also called Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). Both the SRC and the IRB must approve any study prior to subject enrollment. SCI ensures that its clinical research studies are of true scientific merit, high quality, have access to an adequate patient population and meet requisite statistical benchmarks. To accomplish these objectives, the SRC is charged with providing scientific peer review of all research protocols involving cancer patients treated at SCI. The SRC also has the authority to review and approve or deny all trials involving subjects with cancer. The SRC is also responsible for annual reviews of studies and has the authority to suspend or close studies due to low accrual, stopping rule violations, change in scientific relevance or other scientifically-based reason.

View original record on NIH RePORTER →