GGrantIndex
← Search

ACTIVITY OF HIV CO-RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST IN HU-PBL-SCID MICE

$0P01FY2001AINIH

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland OH

Investigators

Abstract

This project will evaluate three issues in the clinical development of antagonists of HIV co-receptors using the hu-PBL-SCID animal model for primary HIV-1 infection. The issues are: (1)- How effective are AOP-RANTES and related compounds at preventing infection with different macrophage- tropic (M-tropic) primary isolates, particularly isolates known to differ in affinity for CCR5 binding? What concentrations of chemokine receptor antagonists must be achieved to prevent HIV-1 infection of hu-PBL-SCID mice, and how long must antagonists be administered to prevent infection? Is there a window of time after virus exposure when administration of chemokine receptor antagonists is effective, and how long is that time period? (2)- How effective are AOP-RANTES and related compounds at blocking continued spread of virus in established infection? The efficiency of chemokine receptor antagonists in treating established infection in the hu-PBL-SCID model will be examined, and the target sites of infection will be controlled by altering the cellular composition of the human PBL grant. Frequent monitoring of HIV-1 by plasma viral RNA levels will give a sensitive readout of antiviral effects. (3)- How rapidly do co-receptor switch variants arise during treatment with a single or multiple co-receptor antagonists? We have worked with HIV-1 clones 242 (M-tropic, CCR5 entry) and 241 (dual-tropic, CCR5 + CXCR4 entry) which differ by only a single amino acid in V3 of gp120. We will determine if and how rapidly 242 mutates under selective pressure from AOP-RANTES treatment, and compare that to combined treatment with antagonists for multiple co-receptors. Additional isolates with multiple co-receptor treatment with antagonists for multiple co-receptors. Additional isolates with multiple co-receptor usage (e.g., isolate 89.6) will also be tested in these experiments to determine if usage of alternative co-receptors such as CCR2b or CCR3 is as efficient as use of the primary co-receptors CCR5 and CXCR4. Co-receptors usage variants arising after treatment of primary patient isolates with the most effective combination of antagonists will be isolated (if they occur) and characterized.

View original record on NIH RePORTER →