Iron, NO, and Lipid Peroxide in Photodynamic Therapy

Medical College Of Wisconsin, Milwaukee WI

Investigators

Linked publications & trials

Abstract

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a unique antitumor modality involving a sensitizing agent, photoexciting light and molecular oxygen, is characterized by local generation of singlet oxygen and other cytotoxic oxidants. When subjected to PDT-induced oxidative stress, many tumors succumb to apoptotic cell death, and much has been learned about how this is affected by factors such as sensitizer localization and efficiency of toxic oxidant generation. However, the influence of metabolic and environmental factors, is still not well understood. Studies supported by the existing grant have focused largely on the effects of nitric oxide (NO) in this regard. Nitric oxide synthase (NOS)-generated NO in low doses is known to have pro-survival and growth-promoting effects on various tumors. Using in vitro models of 5- aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-based PDT and chemical NO donors, we have shown that NO can protect tumor cells against necrotic photokilling by either scavenging lipid-derived radicals or by signaling for heme oxygenase-1 and ferritin induction, leading to depletion of prooxidant iron. We recently discovered that NO is overproduced by ALA/light-stressed breast tumor cells due to rapid and prolonged upregulation of inducible NOS and that this substantially increases cell resistance to intrinsic apoptotic photokilling. This proposal developed largely from this novel observation and is based on the following hypothesis: Under PDT stress, many tumors will overexpress NOS and NO as a cytoprotective response, and this can compromise PDT efficacy. Our overall plan for testing this hypothesis is to study: (i) relative abilities of various established breast, prostate, and skin carcinoma cells to overexpress cytoprotective NOS/NO under ALA/light stress; (ii) mechanisms of NOS induction by photostress; (iii) cytoprotective mechanisms of stress-induced NO; (iv) effects of this NO on bystander cells; and (v) PDT induction of NOS/NO in a mouse xenograft model and NOS inhibitor effects. Planned methods include: cultured cell sensitization, irradiation, and apoptosis evaluation; use of NOS inhibitors, NO scavengers, and chemical NO donors; RNA interference; immunoblotting; confocal microscopy; and PDT of human tumors implanted in immunosuppressed mice; in addition to ALA-PDT, classical Photofrin-PDT will be used. This proposal is significant and innovative for the following reasons: (i) Although positive effects of NOS inhibitors in animal tumor PDT have been reported, there is no known evidence for endogenous NOS/NO upregulation due to PDT; (ii) The prospect of eventually using NOS inhibitors to improve clinical PDT outcomes is favorable, given that human testing of at least one of those to be studied, GW274150 (as an anti-asthmatic), has been reported.